A randomised, single-blind comparison of high-level disinfectants for flexible nasendoscopes.

资源类型:pdf 资源大小:100.00KB 文档分类: 上传者:徐杰

相关文档

批量下载下列文档

文档信息

【作者】 Ben Hitchcock  Sarah C Moynan  Christopher M. A. Frampton  Rosemary Reuther  Peter John Gilling  Fiona Rowe 

【摘要】OBJECTIVES To compare the microbiological efficacy, turnaround time, cost, convenience, and patient and user tolerance of Tristel Trio Wipes, PeraSafe solution and Cidex OPA solution for the high-level disinfection of flexible nasendoscopes. METHODS Flexible nasendoscopes were used in routine clinical encounters. They were then disinfected with one of the three disinfectant methods. Surveillance cultures were taken before and after each disinfection process. Data relating to each of the study parameters were recorded. RESULTS Positive bacterial cultures were discovered on nasendoscopes disinfected with PeraSafe and Cidex OPA. Tristel Trio Wipes have no capital outlay cost, the lowest running cost, the greatest convenience and the fastest turnaround time. PeraSafe had a faster turnaround time than Cidex OPA, and lower running costs. CONCLUSION Tristel Trio Wipes are equal to PeraSafe and Cidex OPA in terms of microbiological efficacy. Turnaround time and cost are dramatically reduced when using Tristel Trio Wipes compared to the other disinfectant methods.

【刊名】The Journal of laryngology and otology

问答

我要提问